Tag Archives: strategy

Ares Games to publish the 2nd edition of Quartermaster General WW2

Feb 6, 2019

Ares announces an agreement with Griggling Games to publish worldwide the second edition of Quartermaster General WW2, a fast-paced strategy game created by Ian Brody and first released in 2015, with nearly 10,000 copies sold in English, French, and Russian. The new edition is planned to release in the second half of 2019.

In Quartermaster General WW2, players take command of the major powers of the Second World War, and supply is crucial to keep their armies and navies fighting. They are challenged to destroy enemies’ supply lines to lead them to surrender. The game is suited for 2 to 6 players, playing one or more countries on either the Axis or Allied team. Each major power has a unique set of strikingly illustrated cards with which to muster their forces, represented by wooden army and navy pieces. The game is simple to learn and quick to setup – but difficult to master, and each game plays differently, ensuring replayability.

First Edition Quartermaster General was nominated for several awards: the 2015 International Gamers Award for General Strategy: Multi-player Game, as well as the 2014 Golden Geek 2014 for Wargame of the Year. In addition, the leading French language board game website awarded Quartermaster General WW2 the Tric Trac 2016 d’or (Gold Medal) for Wargame of the Year. Three expansions were released for the game – “Air Marshal”, “Alternate Histories”, and “Prelude”, and three games using its engine: “Victory or Dead”, “Quartermaster General 1914”, and “Cold War”.

The second edition of Quartermaster General WW2, by Ares Games, represents a careful revision of the original game, improving its ease of play, clarity, play balance, and more. Refreshed packaging artwork heralds the improvements to make this great game even better.

Grenzer Games launches Sector Commander: WWII board game kickstarter

April 5th, 2015

Grenzer Games just launched their Kickstarter campaign for Sector Commander: WWII, their new strategic board game.

Sector Commander: WWII combines elements of card games, board games and war games all in one package that is quick to learn and challenging to master. Using decks of unique Combat Cards to supplement your actions and randomly chosen objective points no two games are alike, with hundreds of variations of board layout, deck composition, objectives and forces.

Over a year in play testing and two years of development, we have reached the point where it’s ready for the wider world to play. If our play testers are any gauge we think you will really love Sector Commander, so we just need your help to get it produced in its full glory.

Holy Roman Empire on Kickstarter from One Small Step Games

March 19th, 2015

One Small Step Games is running a Kickstarter campaign for Holy Roman Empire. Players are charge of one of the countries involved in the 30yrs War. Through political maneuvering as well as battlefield might, they each are looking to come out on top of one of Europe’s longest conflicts.

The year is 1619. Matthias, emperor of Germany, has gone to his grave. A year-old rebellion in the imperial province of Bohemia had divided the empire along religious and political lines. Bohemian rebels have elected a minor German prince, Frederick, elector Palatine, as their king. Protestant princelings rally to Frederick, elevating his status to that of a rival to Em­peror Ferdinand II, Archduke of Austria, for the imperial throne. As mercenary armies are raised against Ferdinand, the Catholic King of Spain and Duke of Bavaria rally to his side. France and Sweden turn their attention to Germany in eager anticipation of the dismemberment of their great rival, the Holy Roman Empire.

Holy Roman Empire is a political and military game of the 17th Century struggle for empire that plunged Europe into one of its longest and most destructive wars. Up to six players control the major dynasties of the era, fielding armies and navies and engaging in diplomatic intrigue and bribery to decide who will exercise control over Europe.

Mirror Box Games launches Chaosmos board game Kickstarter campaign

January 4th, 2014

Mirror Box Games has launched their Kickstarter campaign for Chaosmos, their new board game.

Chaosmos is a 2-4 player card-driven strategy game with miniatures, playable in 60-90 minutes.

In Chaosmos, you are an alien on a desperate quest to find and secure the most important object in the history of the biocosm – The Ovoid. You’ll traverse the galaxy, exploring planets and battling other players to build up a strategic hand of cards.

As you progress through the game, you’ll gather weapons and tactical equipment that help you discover, gain control of, and protect The Ovoid. This mysterious artifact is your civilization’s last hope for survival, and you will have to use deception, misdirection, and strategy to outwit your opponents and possess it at the exact moment the universe collapses! By carefully balancing your hand of cards, spending your turn actions wisely, and cleverly using your alien powers, you’ll maintain a grasp on the state of the game while plunging everyone else into chaos.

Catalyst Game Labs releases “The Duke”

August 6th, 2013

New from Catalyst Game Labs is The Duke, a Chess-like abstract with a few interesting features.

In The Duke, players move their troop tiles around the board and flip them over after each move. Each tile’s side shows a different movement pattern. If you end your movement in a square occupied by an opponent’s tile, you capture it. Capture your opponent’s Duke to win!

There are more than a dozen types of pieces in the base game, each with its own movement and capture rules.  And to top it off, only a few pieces start on the board. One of a player’s options each turn is to draw a random piece from a bag and enter it into the game.

He deserves a big hand for that and we gave him one (A Guide To Hand Management)


He deserves a big hand for that and we gave him one (A Guide To Hand Management)

Written by Andrew at iSlayTheDragon.com (07/05/2013)

There are a lot of new-fangled mechanics that have come to popularity in the recent years: worker placement, deck building, and dice building to name a few. But other mechanics have a much longer history. Among game components that have a rich history dice and cards both trace back over 1000 years. In this mechanic guide we’ll explore the most common implementation of card driven games, Hand Management.

Hand Management: How Does It Work?

Hand Management pre-dates modern board gaming and has gained widespread exposure through various traditional card games such as Hearts, Euchre, Cribbage, and Bridge. The key aspect here is providing players with a hand of cards (or tiles) from which they can play throughout the game in a meaningful way. Generally the decision at hand is when and what order to play the cards in. There is often an emphasis on the interaction between cards with each other and the current game state. Some cards will be more useful if played in combination or in sequence with each other including those that the other players have played.

One of the simplest implementation of Hand Management is found in traditional card games which, as a result, are very accessible and popular. Players are dealt a hand of cards at the start of each round and then play one or more cards in turn order until the hands are depleted. The cards only interact with the other cards played that turn and generally have a single use such as relative power when determining who wins a trick. Concepts like trump are a good example of how the utility of a card may change from round to round. Along those lines, card counting is a good example of how being aware of the game state (what has been played) will alter the relative usefulness of a card..

.. to read the rest of the article check it out at iSlayTheDragon.com

How To Use Math To Crush Your Friends At ‘Risk’ Like You’ve Never Done Before


Written by Walter Hickey and published at Business Insider on July 17th, 2013

When it comes to board games, Risk might be one of the most cutthroat ways to  spend an evening among friends.

Sure, Monopoly involves quite a bit of capitalist-oriented skulduggery, but Risk  involves actually attacking your fellow players. With armies. To take their  stuff.

Like Monopoly, Risk involves both skill and luck. The objective of Risk  is to take over the world by eliminating all of your enemies.  You amass territory by attacking your adversaries’  armies. When you attack enemies, you roll  dice.

Since attacking and defending with dice define every interaction on the Risk  board, knowing the ways to use the statistics of battle to your advantage give  you a distinct advantage when playing.

Here, we look at Risk as mathematically as possible, drawing from some  excellent scholarship on the subject.

The Board

By far the most important thing to  understand is the map. Controlling the continents gives you an added bonus  depending on the size of the continent.

Garrett Robinson, who graduated MIT in  2009, wrote a paper  outlining the math behind Risk.

From his paper, here’s the Risk board:


That’s somewhat misleading though. The size of the territories can be  misleading, making it seem like certain areas are more difficult to hold than  others.

Plus, you can’t really get a sense of how truly vulnerable some individual  territories are.

Here’s a better way of looking at the same map, devised by  Robinson:


So we know a few stats about the board right off the bat.

Here are the number of bonus armies you get for every turn you hold each  continent.

  • Asia — 12 territories,  7 armies per turn
  • Europe — 7 territories, 5 armies per turn
  • North America — 9 territories, 5 armies per  turn
  • Africa — 6 territories, 3 armies per  turn
  • South America — 4 territories, 2 armies per  turn
  • Australia — 4 territories, 2 armies per  turn

This also gives us a look at which  continents have the highest return on holding territories.

This list shows you territories divided by  armies. As you’ll see, Europe gives you the highest return on holding the  continent, as for every 1.4 territories you hold, you get an army. Australia is  the least lucrative, as it takes holding 2 territories to win each  army.

  • Europe — Holding 1.4 territories per army
  • Asia — Holding 1.7 territories per army
  • Europe — Holding 1.4 territories per army
  • North America — Holding 1.8 territories per army
  • Africa — Holding 2 territories per army
  • South America —Holding 2 territories per army
  • Australia — Holding 2 territories per army

But there’s an even more important thing to keep in mind…


It’s not just about ensuring that you get the maximum value per territory,  it’s also about minimizing the probability that your opponents can take one  territory and strip you of your continent bonus.

This is to say that continents with only one or two sources of invasion are  easier to defend than continents with five or six routes of invasion.

So let’s look at how many ways there are to  invade each continent, and how many territories lie on borders. If you’re  looking to defend on home turf, you’ve got to fortify every border territory  that can serve as a means of invasion.

risk board game invasion 

Since a bunch of your continent’s bonus armies are going to go into  fortifying your border countries, let’s look at the ratio of armies awarded for  holding the continent to border territories that have to be held:

  • Asia — 5 border territories,  7 armies per turn, 1.4 bonus  armies per border territory
  • Europe — 4 border territories, 5 armies per turn, 1.25 bonus  armies per border territory
  • North America — 3 border territories, 5 armies per turn, 1.7  bonus armies per border territory
  • Africa — 3 border territories, 3 armies per turn, 1 bonus army  per border territory
  • South America — 2 border territories,  2 armies per turn, 1 bonus army per border  territory
  • Australia — 1 border territory, 2 armies per turn, 2 bonus armies  per border territory

So we can see that Australia is obviously  the easiest to defend, with 2 bonus armies allocated each turn to aid in the  defense of the continent on the border.

But of the countries that give out  the biggest rewards, North America is the easiest to hold, and holds the largest  bonus per border. 

Surprisingly, Europe is actually more  difficult to hold than Asia when you look at how many border territories need to  be defended for each bonus army awarded by holding it.

Africa and South America only provide one  bonus army for each border territory that requires a defense.

But enough of preparing for battle.

Now let’s dive into the stats and find out when you should fight.


Here are the rules of what happens when one  territory invades a neighbor, as explained by an  outstanding DataGenetics blog post about the stats of Risk:

Battles occur in rounds, with an  attacking player typically rolling (up to) 3 dice, and a defending player (up  to) 2 dice. After rolling, dice are paired up (Highest rolled attacker die  against highest rolled defender die, then next highest rolled pair if required).  The highest rolled number wins (eliminating one opponent army), with ties  resulting in a win by the defender. Attacks by more than three armies are played in a  series of rounds. After each round, armies from the losing team are removed from  the board and the remaining pieces continue to duel.

So our main question is who has the advantage  here.

Here’s a look from Nick Berry’s  DataGenetics  blog post about what each roll looks like. Keep in mind,  prolonged battles are comprised of long series of these rolls, but let’s look at  the simplest possible cases first:


So what do we see?

Generally speaking, whoever rolls more dice does better. When  the dice are evenly matched, the defender tends to win out.

But what does this mean for long, protracted campaigns?

First published in Mathematics Magazine, Jason Osborne of North  Carolina State University tackled this problem with Markov chains in an outstanding 2003  paper. 

This chart shows you attacker win probabilities in battle  between two armies at various strengths:


So what can we see from this?

  • The only time the attacker is at the  statistical disadvantage attacking an equivalent number of defenders is when the  attacker has less than 5 armies attacking (see the line with vertical slop,  referred to as A=D)
  • In large battles, the attacker has the  advantage, even when they’re slightly outnumbered. This is because of the extra  dice the attacker has to roll.
  • The larger the battle, the larger the  attacker advantage.
So if you have a border destined for  dispute: attack, attack, attack.


Here are the five things to  take away from this.

  • Holding the continent of Europe requires you to hold the fewest number of  territories per bonus army. However, almost 60% of European territories lie on a  border. The per-territory reward comes with risk.
  • That risk can be measured by the ratio of continental bonus armies per  border territory. North America has the most favorable ratio.
  • Africa is easy to invade but difficult to  hold. The amount you need to commit to its defense make it a particularly unsafe  Australia.
  • When you know battle is inevitable, attack as soon as you have the same  number of attacking armies as your opponent has defending armies. You hold the  advantage.
  • The larger the battle, the larger the attacker advantage.

And of course, never attempt a land war in Asia. That’s just basic.

Read more:  http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-use-math-to-win-at-the-board-game-risk-2013-7#ixzz2ZUvLdy5Y